American’s Flight 1776 to
Philadelphia? Hilarious.
Southwest’s
Flight 1492 to Columbus, Ohio? Clever.
Alaska’s
Flight 2738 to Portland? Not a side-splitter (and not meant to be), but I don’t
blame Alaska, and it certainly exemplifies that problem that we’re talking
about.
The
fun flight numbers may stay, but as for the rest, the numbers’ numbers are up.
If you need
a break from worrying about nuclear war and how tax reform is going to affect
your business, ponder flight numbers. I’ve added it to my list of things to
worry about in 2018, and I keep hearing Frank Sinatra crooning, “There may be
trouble ahead,” from Irving Berlin’s “Let’s Face the Music and Dance.”
A
reader asked recently about flight numbers, and like anything that has to do
with airlines, you ask a simple question and you won’t get a simple answer.
That’s
not a knock on airlines, but a commentary on the enormous challenges of and
changes in the industry. Unfortunately, there’s a price to be paid.
Assigning
flight numbers “used to be an art, believe it or not,” said Brett Snyder,
president of CrankyFlier.com, which deals with all manner of airline questions
and offers air travel assistance.
There is beauty in simplicity. Several flights are the numeral 1, including American Airlines’ flight from New York’s John F. Kennedy to Los Angeles International, which leaves at 8 a.m. and arrives just before noon. It’s a longtime route and has a certain prestige to it.
It
also has a blot on its history. American’s Flight 1 crashed in 1962, killing
all aboard. American did not retire that number, although many airlines do
after an accident. Asiana Airlines, for instance, changed the Flight 214 number
assigned to the Seoul-San Francisco route after a July 2013 crash at SFO in
which three people were killed and scores injured.
American
and United retired the flight numbers of the planes downed in the 9/11 attacks,
although United accidentally reactivated them because of a system glitch
(and then deactivated them).
On
a whimsical note, airlines sometimes do the numeric version of wordplay, Snyder
said. Besides Philly and Columbus, you’ll sometimes find flights to Vegas with the
flight number 711 (Spirit has had one). You may find a 415 (JetBlue and
Southwest) for flights to San Francisco (its area code) or a 66 for a JetBlue
flight from JFK to Albuquerque (presumably for Route 66, never mind St. Louis;
Joplin, Mo.; Oklahoma City ….)
Eight
is considered a lucky number in some Asian cultures, so flights to that part of
the world may use that number.
But
what’s happening with most flight numbers is far from amusing. Because of
mergers and growth in the airline industry, it’s running out of numbers.
That’s
because flight numbers cannot be larger than four digits.
Why
not just make them bigger, like adding extra letters or digits to a license
plate?
Easy
for us to say, not so easy for airlines to do, Snyder said. Airline computer
systems are hard-coded for no more than four digits. And that means the number
of available numbers is finite.
When
you tell people there are 10,000 flights a day, “most people think…10,000 is a
lot for any given day,” Snyder said. “It’s not.”
Factor
in that numbers are used only once a day and some numbers aren’t used at all,
including 13 and, yes, 666 and….“We’re running out of numbers!” Southwest
explains in a post called “The Science Behind the Numbers.”
“To
start with, the numero uno industrywide-rule is that no flight number can
contain more than four digits, meaning we only have up to flight number 9999 to
work with,” Southwest writes.
“(No
airline can use five-digit flight numbers! While this has been debated in the
industry for years, the level of effort to make the change from four to five
digits would be huge, and even the level of technology change to add alpha
characters to published flight numbers would be gargantuan…although it would be
fun to ‘name’ flights—‘Now boarding, Southwest Airlines Flight FRED to Los
Angeles.’)”
Somehow, I
just can’t imagine WN FRED. (WN is Southwest’s two-letter code. Many of those
codes make sense — AA for American and BA for British Airways — but some do
not.)
The
numbers are becoming so scarce that one of the identifying factors of flight
numbers — eastern and northern destinations were usually even numbered and
western and southern were odd — are generally not used that way these days,
Southwest noted in its post.
Some
airlines with “there and back” flights use the same number going and coming in
order to conserve.
Eventually,
the numbers will be expanded, but it will be difficult and hugely expensive,
Snyder said, and we know who will end up paying for that, don't we?
We
can blame the people who failed to imagine the future, starting with Irish-born
physicist Lord Kelvin who supposedly said in 1895 that “heavier-than-air flying
machines are impossible.”
Now
the only thing that seems impossible is finding numbers to designate where all
these routes go. It may be time to just face the music and dance.
by Catharine Hamm for the LA Times
#travel #traveltips #travelingcynthia #airtravel
No comments:
Post a Comment